A Southern University law professor has been suspended after a controversial social media post about conservative activist Charlie Kirk sparked backlash nationwide. The incident has reignited debates over free speech, professionalism in higher education, and the limits of online expression for faculty at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).
The Post That Sparked the Suspension
The professor, Kelly Carmena, reportedly made the comments on her personal social media account shortly after Kirk was fatally shot on September 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University.
In her post, Carmena stated: “I will 1000% wish death on people like him. He is the epitome of evil, and I have no compassion, not even a minute ounce of it for people like him who go around spewing hate the way he does.”
The message quickly gained traction online, drawing sharp criticism from conservative media outlets and political figures.
Southern University’s Response
Southern University’s Board Chairman, Tony Clayton, confirmed Carmena’s immediate suspension. In an official statement, Clayton emphasized that the professor’s remarks were inconsistent with the standards expected of faculty at the Baton Rouge institution.
“Distasteful statements should not be tolerated, particularly as it relates to death,” Clayton said. “That conduct will not be tolerated at Southern University, period.”
The university also announced it will launch a formal investigation, which could lead to Carmena’s termination.
Broader National Backlash
This suspension follows a national trend in which employees across various sectors have faced consequences for public comments about Kirk’s death. According to reports, several professionals have been reprimanded, suspended, or even fired for posting statements that either celebrated or dismissed the conservative activist’s killing.
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance also weighed in, calling for “accountability” for individuals making statements that glorify or trivialize Kirk’s death.
Free Speech vs. Professional Standards
The incident has sparked conversations on social media and within academic circles about the tension between free speech rights and professional responsibility. Supporters of Carmena argue that faculty members should not face employment consequences for personal opinions expressed online, even if controversial. Critics, however, contend that such remarks cross a line when they appear to condone violence or celebrate death.
This tension is especially sensitive at HBCUs like Southern University, where faculty are often seen as role models to students and representatives of the broader HBCU community.
What’s Next for Southern University
As the investigation continues, Southern University has not provided a timeline for its final decision on Carmena’s employment. The case is being closely watched not only within the HBCU community but also nationally, as it reflects ongoing cultural and political divides surrounding free expression, higher education, and online discourse.
Closing
The suspension of a Southern University professor over comments about Charlie Kirk underscores the complexities of social media in the modern era. For HBCUs and higher education institutions alike, this case raises critical questions about where the line should be drawn between personal freedom of speech and professional accountability.